Wednesday, August 27. 2008The Recycling Greenscam as New Media Biz modelTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Listen if you do insist on pointing out the Emperors clothes your just going to upset an awful lot of people.
Meanwhile what are we going to do with all this plastic ? Its worse than glass for its lack of disintegrating. What I would love to see is a reduction in the consumerism production of equipment to a repair/maintain/upgrade model. Currently to upgrade my console i have to buy a whole new one. Hmm maybe I should stick to my Gaming PC rig because its greener. Well more Beige anyway. No particular point to this comment other than to say its Waste that is at the issue of green and whilst consumers produce an awful lot of it they are still only 20% of the problem. When will the govts start penalising the businesses over the consumer for their waste.
You are being far too rational - the Greenscam is all about getting guilty consumers to buy tat in the hope it makes em greener, while diverting attention from the real issue (industry also uses 75% of our energy)
I know a bit about the plastic thing - industry wants to use (and sell) plastic so has diverted the arguments re "overpackaging" (or even worse, the expensive - to them - "build to repair" model)of a few years ago into the more convenient "recycling" bucket rather than address use at source..
I thought I was being more Glib than Rational ! To big business I suspect greens not the issue nor is energy . These large corporations are trying to work out how to turn 2nd and 3rd world markets into global consumers and brand absorbers like those in the 1st world west. If I was big business id be feeling that my markets are tapping out and were in need of the green message just so we could feel good about buying.
as for landfill im pretty sure 100% of the waste creators still account for less than 1% of the human population and that accounts for less than 1% of the earths surface as a whole. I say ( as your post does ) follow the money.
Well there's really two issues to consider when looking at recycling: whether it's beneficial to the environment, and whether it's a good exercise in waste management.
The benefits to the environment depend largely on where and how it's done. A well-managed, well-structured landfill can be far better than "junkyard recycling" (which is what many of the third-world facilities, where your old PCs get shipped, are). However, as an exercise in waste management development, recycling everything you can makes sense even when subsidized. Markets for commodities are unpredictable, and what is cost-effective to recycle today may not be tomorrow - and vice versa. Subsidizing recycling effectively means subsidizing the development of recycling technology, something which will prove beneficial in the long term. (If you want a long-term bet, buy up land which has been used for landfill prior to the implementation of WEEE etc. When fresh resources are finite, sooner or later that rubbish dump will prove to be a gold mine |
QuicksearchMore Broad StuffFor More Information about Broadsight:
Contact us Broadsight website Articles To sign up for Broadstuff on other services: Broadstuff - the Twitter edition Broadstuff - the Jaiku edition Broadstuff - the FriendFeed edition Subscribe to Broadstuff via email Books we are reading: Poll of the WeekWill Augmented reality just be a flash in the pan?
Archives Alan Patrick (@freecloud) 's Twitter FeedPopular Entries
Categories
Creative Commons LicenceBlog Administration |