Thursday, April 17. 2008Will Google survive? Search Me......Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
i already use Facebook for all my search needs. It's a veritable Alexandria Library of answers and knowledge, such as 'I have been bitten by a vampire' and 'who would win, pirates or ninjas?', or even the answer to human civilisation's biggest ever question - Am I Hot, Or Not?
honestly. anyone who feels they can get at all the relevant information and knowledge out there, through their social network, is a tool, and/or has very little curiosity about the world at large, and/or is not averse to participating in groupthink. Google already monitors the world's biggest social network, the Internet itself. Concepts like 'Friendship' and 'Social network' are so different in this day and age - virtual, transient, in constant flux, open to people you've never met and have nothing in common with - that there is precious little difference between searching the Web, and searching your social network. You might argue there are spam benefits to social network search, but frankly, Google et al are doing pretty good on that mark as well. My suspicion is that people are trying to find value in social networking beyond the obvious, in part to retroactively justify hype and hyped valuation. Any data on how successful LinkedIn's "ask a question" feature is? It never really seemed to 'fit' the site. One of the key new learnings for the gen Y is that collaborative learning (as opposed to individual / rote / classroom teaching) is a very valid method. Social media sites encourage this.
Think the wisdom of crowds... Issues with this are for education - how to assess / grade a collaborative effort versus individual. Issues for politics - Obama's collaborative policymaking approach is at odds to historic Clinton-style "I", "me" self-centric, I-have-the-answer-to-everything. Which is more likely to produce strong policymaking? there is a place for search, comparison shopping AND collaborative search/learning online. I certainly am thinking of wisdom of the crowds. One of its key tenets is that the more open and diverse a crowd is, the better; Secondly, the larger it is, the better. Without these two factors, Wikipedia would never have been created. Your personal network could never have put it together, and if it had tried, would have been more prone to groupthink.
The fact is, I don't want my tools' understanding of me to be determined by my social network - for fear of a positive feedback loop between who I am, and who my social network thinks I am. I want random, untargeted ads/knowledge/content to catch my eye from time to time, to make me think about who consumes this stuff and why, what are the merits. I would never had had a unique, broad and occasionally quite eclectic taste in music if my only source of new music was either the radio, or a radio station created based on what my social network listens to. I want a tool like Last.fm which learns from ME, not my social network -I have no problems with it mining either my friends or complete strangers for recommendations, but that's a very different thing to small world/personal network searching. |
QuicksearchFor More Information
Contact us Broadsight website Articles Broadstuff - the Twitter edition Broadstuff - the Jaiku edition Broadstuff - the FriendFeed edition Subscribe to Broadstuff via email Shameless Plug - vote Broadstuff for Best UK Web 2.0 / Business Blog (we like the big red button anyways.....) Books we are reading: BookmarkArchivesBlog AdministrationCreative Commons LicenceCategories
|